Main content starts here

NOW Tests Resveratrol Products Purchased Online, Reveals Significant Problems

image of Japanese knotweed plant
Published Date

NOW has continued the testing program on products purchased online, with the company’s state of the art labs recently investigating 30 Resveratrol supplements purchased on Amazon. This is NOW's 18th round of product testing since 2017, all of which have raised serious concerns.

“Buyer beware” certainly applies to resveratrol, as we found significant problems with most products tested,” said Dan Richard, NOW Health Group VP of Global Sales and Marketing. “Once again, NOW will share this info with Amazon directly and with the FDA, in hopes of further action.”

This popular antioxidant supplement was first isolated in 1939 and has been sold by NOW since 2005. It is a polyphenol naturally found in grapes, red wine, peanuts, and herbs such as Japanese knotweed roots. There are two types of resveratrol: cis-resveratrol and trans-resveratrol. Both have the same molecular formula, but trans-resveratrol is more bioavailable and easier for the body to absorb. Japanese knotweed extract is the most common form of resveratrol in dietary supplements, and the trans-resveratrol portion is often found between 50-98%. Natural resveratrol also contains many trace levels of additional antioxidants, while synthesized resveratrol is isolated chemically and does not contain other synergistic components. 

NOW bought two bottles of each product from 30 brands, including NOW, on Amazon. Even before testing, most products seemed suspicious due to inflated potencies and mislabeling on the front label panels.

In addition to in-house testing, NOW sent one unopened bottle of each brand to Alkemist Labs, an industry-leading contract laboratory NOW has partnered with previously, for an independent report on the same products. Both NOW and Alkemist performed high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) testing. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet light detection (HPLC-UV) is the correct method to accurately measure the amount of trans-resveratrol in a sample. Resveratrol is a very interesting natural compound to test due to its complexity and labeling options. It's important to note that labeling for resveratrol dietary supplements is inconsistent across different brands.

Below are various examples of Supplement Facts panels to illustrate the extent of these differences and the potential confusion they may cause. NOW found two-thirds of the 30 brands tested have confusing or dishonest labeling for Resveratrol.  They also found that 21 out of 30 brands tested were below labeled potency, and 17 contained less than 10% of claimed potency.  Many brands display the highest potency number on the front panel and in Amazon search terms, but “tricky” labeling on the side panel may not match numbers. 

  • Both aSquared Nutrition Resveratrol Ultra Strength and NasaBe’Ahava Resveratrol 1000 mg claim to contain 1,000 mg of Resveratrol on the front panel. However, they only provide "8% potency yield" per 2 capsules, resulting in just 40 mg of Resveratrol per capsule, significantly lower than the claimed amount. Although aSquared Nutrition's test results indicated a higher amount than 40 mg, the initial claim remains deceptive. It is worth noting that aSquared Nutrition has failed NOW’s testing program 12 times out of 12 different products, resulting in a 100% failure rate.
  • Purify Life Resveratrol Gummies claims “1500 mg per serving” on the front panel, but only 10 mg of 150:1 extract in the Supplements Facts panel.  This is deceptive and improper labeling.
  • The front panel of the July 69 brand indicates that it contains 600 mg of Resveratrol per serving. However, the side panel lists the ingredients as "Resveratrol Blend 600 mg" and includes additional complicated information such as "Japanese Knotweed (10% Trans-Resveratrol) (Polygonum cuspidatum)(root), Japanese Knotweed (50% Trans-Resveratrol)(Polygonum cuspidatum)(root)" in very small font size. This labeling might be confusing for some people who are trying to understand what these percentages and ingredients mean.
  • The side panel of Dr. Martin’s Nutrition Resveratrol lists "Trans-Resveratrol Complex" as 920 mg per two capsules, combined with nine other fruits and herbs. The side panel has an extremely small font size and is barely legible. The high claimed potency, unknown brand, and misleading labeling led us to include this product in testing.

NOW HPLC Testing Resveratrol Supplements August 2024

Brand Tested for Resveratrol Size Lot # Label Claim/Cap Honest Labeling NOW Test (mg/cap) Alkemist Test (mg/cap) Avg % of Label Claim
aSquared FL 180 Veg Caps RE9997-320-2A 500 mg/8% No 43 44 9%
biodora Formula, GA 180 Veg Caps BR675131-L2 400 mg Trans No 19 17 5%
Clean Nutra Formula, CA 60 Capsules VM2300316/1 300 mg No 2 1 0%
Doublewood Supplements, PA 120 Veg Caps 2321501 250 mg/125 mg Yes 122 130 100%
Dr. Martins Nutrition, NV 180 Veg Caps R23354002 460 mg Trans No 35 36 8%
EN Health, NY 90 Gummies 384248010901 750 mg/98% No 6 5 1%
Fito Medic's, Columbia 180 Capsules FEXPO194 45,000 mg No 133 137 0%
GeneX Formulas, FL 90 Veg Caps RE8057-170-1 500 mg/50% No 242 256 50%
GriMed Formula, KY 90 Veg Caps 230304 200 mg Trans No 10 11 5%
July 69, WY 60 Veg Caps RVT231110-60 600 mg Blend No 152 156 Inconclusive
MAAC10 FL 60 Veg Caps M232684S 250 mg Trans Inconclusive 238 246 97%
MECISCO Formula, OR 90 Veg Caps M/MRES89C04/1-1000 500 mg Trans Inconclusive 3 0 0%
MyPrimaVita Formula, GA 90 Veg Caps PR6624-071-L1 333 mg Trans No 14 16 5%
NasaBe'Ahava, FL 180 Veg Caps 130923 1000 mg/8% No 45 43 4%
Nature Bell, CA 180 Veg Caps P2311016 333 mg Trans Yes 288 303 89%
NOW Foods, IL 60 Veg Caps 3339738 700 mg/350 mg Yes 386 412 114%
Nutricost, Utah 120 Veg Caps 24031315 700 mg/350 mg Yes 365 359 103%
NutriVein Formula, WA 120 Veg Caps NV1023 302 mg No 30 32 10%
Purely Beneficial Formula, CA 180 Veg Caps NR6844-143-L1 302 mg No 5 6 2%
Purest Vantage, FL 60 Veg Caps RE6185-029-L1 300 mg/50% No 157 144 50%
Purify Life Gummies, IL 60 Gummies 215011001R 5 mg No 5 6 100%
Purity Labs, CA 90 Veg Caps A24B011 675 mg Trans No 10 13 2%
Simple Organics, DE 90 Veg Caps SR6790-117-L1 400 mg Trans No 14 16 4%
Super Natural GOODS, FL 60 Veg Caps Illegible 302 mg Trans Inconclusive 334 341 112%
Sylan, TX 180 Veg Caps RAR1008 500 mg No 44 51 10%
Teaveli12 hour SR, 2.5X, CA 30 Veg Caps 142301023 333 mg Inconclusive 107 101 31%
Thomas all-natural Remedies 120 Veg Caps TR10427 400 mg Trans No 27 28 7%
Toniiq, IL 60 Veg Caps 23L0051 300 mg Trans Yes 307 322 105%
We Like Vitamins, TX 180 Veg Caps 60231 500 mg/8% No 40 43 8%
Zetelixia Gummies, CA 60 Gummies Illegible 750 mg Trans Inconclusive 0 0 0%

(Note: Regarding the discrepancy in lab-to-lab results, there will always be a level of deviation between labs due to various factors such as method differences, uncertainty, different analysts, instrumentation, etc. Even within the same lab, results are rarely identical.)

Both labs also used high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) for internal testing to check if Japanese knotweed was used as a source of resveratrol. They compared the samples with verified Japanese knotweed reference material and assessed their similarity. This testing was carried out at Alkemist Labs alongside the HPLC testing. Most of the samples contained resveratrol extract with a purity of over 98%. In these cases, neither could confirm the botanical source. The results from both labs are shared below:

NOW HPTLC Testing Resveratrol Supplements August 2024

Brand Tested for HPTLC NOW HPTLC Result Alkemist HPTLC Result
aSquared FL Passes Passes
biodora Formula, GA Fails Fails
Clean Nutra Formula, CA Fails Fails
Doublewood Supplements, PA Passes Passes
Dr. Martins Nutrition, NV Fails Fails
EN Health, NY Cannot verify botanical source Cannot verify botanical source
Fito Medic's, Columbia Cannot verify botanical source Cannot verify botanical source
GeneX Formulas, FL Passes Passes
GriMed Formula, KY Cannot verify botanical source Cannot verify botanical source
July 69, WY Fails Fails
MAAC10 FL Cannot verify botanical source Fails
MECISCO Formula, OR Fails Fails
MyPrimaVita Formula, GA Passes Passes
NasaBe'Ahava, FL Passes Passes
Nature Bell, CA Cannot verify botanical source Cannot verify botanical source
NOW Foods, IL Passes Passes
Nutricost, Utah Passes Passes
NutriVein Formula, WA Fails Fails
Purely Beneficial Formula, CA Fails Fails
Purest Vantage, FL Passes Passes
Purify Life Gummies, IL Cannot verify the botanical source Cannot verify the botanical source
Purity Labs, CA Passes Passes
Simple Organics, DE Passes Passes
Super Natural GOODS, FL Cannot verify the botanical source Cannot verify the botanical source
Sylan, TX Passes Passes
Teaveli12 hour SR, 2.5X, CA Cannot verify the botanical source Cannot verify the botanical source
Thomas all-natural Remedies Passes Passes
Toniiq, IL Cannot verify the botanical source Cannot verify the botanical source
We Like Vitamins, TX Passes Passes
Zetelixia Gummies, CA Fails Fails

“The results above further substantiate the fact that the market is saturated with unscrupulous companies that make false claims,” Richard said. “Consumers should be cautious when buying from lesser-known brands and opt for trusted, honest, and transparent brands.

See more quality issues that NOW has uncovered through their award-winning testing program.

Learn More